<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macbook vs Macbook Pro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/</link>
	<description>travelling the forest of life</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/#comment-6690</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/#comment-6690</guid>
		<description>the only thing you left out in the comparison is  durability. I think the macbook pro's cover and frame is a bit more robust. That said I think for mobility the macbook wins out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only thing you left out in the comparison is  durability. I think the macbook pro&#8217;s cover and frame is a bit more robust. That said I think for mobility the macbook wins out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topfunky</title>
		<link>http://ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/#comment-6679</link>
		<dc:creator>topfunky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/#comment-6679</guid>
		<description>I bought the low end MacBook and it works great (but it's not my primary machine). I'd love to see something even smaller and more portable.

Remember that these new laptops are easy to upgrade. More RAM or a larger HD can be installed in minutes, so you don't need to buy a more expensive model if you just need more storage space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the low end MacBook and it works great (but it&#8217;s not my primary machine). I&#8217;d love to see something even smaller and more portable.</p>
<p>Remember that these new laptops are easy to upgrade. More RAM or a larger HD can be installed in minutes, so you don&#8217;t need to buy a more expensive model if you just need more storage space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/#comment-6670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/#comment-6670</guid>
		<description>I'm with Ben.  The deal breaker is the graphics chipset.  The Intel graphics are capable, decent chips as long as you don't expect a top rate gaming chip.  

so... what are you asking for the G4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Ben.  The deal breaker is the graphics chipset.  The Intel graphics are capable, decent chips as long as you don&#8217;t expect a top rate gaming chip.  </p>
<p>so&#8230; what are you asking for the G4?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Powell</title>
		<link>http://ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/#comment-6668</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/#comment-6668</guid>
		<description>Dude...wtf...pro = prestige</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude&#8230;wtf&#8230;pro = prestige</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/#comment-6665</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghostwheel.net/2007/04/17/macbook-vs-macbook-pro/#comment-6665</guid>
		<description>MacBook. Extra cost isn't worth it unless you plan on gaming, and the 13.3" is the perfect size for portability. Come on though, pay the black tax!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacBook. Extra cost isn&#8217;t worth it unless you plan on gaming, and the 13.3&#8243; is the perfect size for portability. Come on though, pay the black tax!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
